Skip to main content
Essay · 2026 · 4 min read

Who owns your behaviour?

Every day you generate a record of yourself that you will never see. Where you go, what you buy, how long you hesitate before adding something to a cart, what you scroll past without reading. Somewhere, that record is stored, structured and sold. The question I keep coming back to is simple, and almost nobody asks it out loud: who owns your behaviour?

Legally, the answer is murky by design. Consent is buried in a cookie banner nobody reads properly. Portability exists on paper more than in practice. Most people can request a copy of their data and receive, at best, a file they can't interpret and can't use. Ownership you can't exercise isn't ownership, it's a legal fiction that makes everyone feel better about an arrangement that mostly benefits one side.

I don't think the answer is to demonise the companies collecting this data. Behavioural data, used well, is genuinely useful, it's how products get better, how fraud gets caught, how markets clear more efficiently. The problem isn't that behaviour is measured. It's that the person being measured is almost never in the room when the value gets split.

What would it actually look like if that changed? People able to see their own behavioural record in language they understand, not a raw export. The ability to move it, delete it or license it on their own terms, the way you'd expect to be able to move a bank balance. Businesses that compete on giving people that access, instead of competing on how well they can hide the fact that they don't.

This is the argument underneath everything I've built at Simplifyer, and it's the argument I keep making in rooms that would rather not hear it. Behaviour is not a byproduct of being alive in a digital economy. It's an asset. And an asset without a clearly identified owner tends to get claimed by whoever gets there first, not by whoever deserves it.

I'd like the answer to "who owns your behaviour" to be obvious. Right now it isn't, and that gap is exactly where the next decade of value, and the next decade of harm, is going to be decided.

Related essays
Lucidity is economic power The next generation of companies shouldn't make people more predictable, they should make them more lucid.
The price of being understood Being profiled by an algorithm isn't the same as being understood. What we give up when we let a company understand us for us.
Data is the oil of the next century From the Women in Tech stage: controlling our future means controlling our information, and reading the cookie banner before we accept it.
Back to all essays